The EVP of Faith.

Are EVP recordings simply more evidence that most cannot discern an intelligent response from a sentient one? Is the EVP phenomenon a case for a quantized Google search engine? Again, it seems to be a case of a mirror to the expectations and anticipation of the questioners, which I am sure most readers would recognise as the chief feature of the observer making a distinction that skews the results, where the chips fall, that the dead speak to us, that perhaps what the difference may be while the speaker has long since evaporated, the information that was self organised around his own distinctions, have not vanished, that they remain in what has been termed "a quantum plenum"
What are loaded gambles, having a horse in the race? I cannot think of a more loaded series of questioners who are largely joined at the hip to wanting to hear their own hopes certified. What I am saying is I suspect the phenomenon is genuine but the nonsense attached to it, well, unless someone is equally brain dead, it's an obvious belief system..self referential and hermetically sealed.
Is there another manifesting mysterious phenomenon prone to this? How about the non existent state of Ufology? Faith in specifically what? Faith in one's beliefs, as I noted in the last post, may be self prophecies of what shall become of you and I, once divorced from our somatic host encounters as the metaphysicians of old once warned..  Of course my favorite question is "What exactly is a vortex? Syd Barrett once asked, "What exactly is a joke?" Much gnashing of the bicuspids in the outer darkness seems to prevail. Do we require lies in the face of the absence of truth? Perhaps as a crutch.As Bob Dlyan once said, "I never asked for much, never asked for your crutch, so don't ask for mine.." Indeed. The beliefs surrounding EVP phenomenon might be like a ship being launched that has already sunk. Whether it has a resemblance to the Droste Effect of infinite regression placed onto a CD, whereas one cannot discern the past from the present remains to be seen. Then again, if the EVP Effect is not rooted in direct human sentience in a spacial anomaly, where is the owner of the voice who is missing from this spooky action from a distance?  Whomever or whatever they may have been seems to support a fallacy that they must remain in the artifice of the personality construct, which has no independant means of volition except as being a self measuring set of references.In other words, the manifestation of personality not as a process, but as a independant agent which seems both a defensively egotistical barrier against the slings and arrows of honest uncertainty that does not recognize we are not the be all and end all of the universe.
Our species could vanish in a heartbeat, and while our version of the universe would implode, the one without us would do just fine. So, placing all the considerations I have outlined within the context, we prefer the universe to be a mirror of our anticipations and it well may be but then again, we might be weaving our own web to be entangled within, or..have we already accomplished this?

The Energy Theory of Anomalous Atmospheric Phenomenon.

The Signal Noise of Dystopian Mirrors
If you take extraterrestrial spacemen, time traveler's, various sorts of angels and demons out of any equation that would explain the strange narratives and odd happenings around the awfully named UFO phenomenon, what do you have? 

Forget Dualities...
When I began looking into the strange experiences of witnesses, the only consistent quality I could determine was the relationship between the observer and the observed could not be taken literally. Science at one point thought the mind controlled the constituent body, whereas we now know the mind informs the body and vice versa.

An Evolution of Contingent Relationships.....
The more science looks into either the nature of organic life or the energy that manifests it, the constituent subsystems that comprise nature are interlinked and exhibit both self organisation only in relation to the whole. In other words, there are no closed systems, only relationships that are contingent, evolving, mutating, appearing disappearing. However, I suspect Vallee is correct that information is energy and vice versa, and so all of these self organising subsystems could be considered intelligent without sentience, in of themselves in abeyance to the whole. Memory is much the same, a sort of genome, and consciousness is self organising in abeyance to it's environment. The aggregate sum of these various states are incommensurable to the whole yet they have similarities to it. The witness testimony comes from a rearrangement of relationships, if you will, reversed, where the inside becomes the outside and vice versa. This indicates a transient state of affairs that in the whole is cyclic, where memory is turned back on it's own associative functioning to project a simulation within the normal somatic simulations it processes continually under normally somewhat stable conditions. What causes this disfunction of neurology? This is where I point out that distortion in my opinion is not a theory and is a poor descriptor like "UFO" and if a theory is not explainable, it is not a theory. It is simply a mishmash of words, terms etc. 

Imagination, Information and Energy 
Paul Kimball  in his reflections on creativity are echoing Ibn Al Arabi in that image ( internal and external) and imagination are one in the same. There is no "Bruce" referents are not what is being described, the same problem of referents taking Ufology on wild goose chases thinking that this reversal of inner and outer simulations means somewhat like, there's little people in our radios or televisions, external mirror images of ourselves out to screw us over. Its just ( in my opinion ) an ignorant ontology.One could describe the witness testimony as being correlated to their exposure to high levels of localised energy in varying field strengths, also collaborated by plasma like orbs that are as transient as the witnesses experiential anomalies. Also noted are the often noted correlations between the geological composition of the location in relation to having an influence on conductance. Some areas are more prone than others, so it becomes a question of probability in relation to the precursors that may enhance an transient atmospheric disturbance.


http://www.forteantimes.com/strangedays/ufofiles/5461/ufo_casebook.html
 

Using Ourselves As A Yardstick Using this cellular concept, one can see if energy and information are transcribable to one another, something must have changed, fairly rapidly in these relationships to alter biology ( neurology) on a transient basis, where we mistake intelligent but not sentient processing in a changed arrangement for the machinations of others like ourselves and theres the rub. We are fixed in our perceptions using ourselves as a comparative basis to measure experience, giving it this or that value. Like Gurdjieff said, it's like a player piano, no one is driving the cart. So of course we think because we see things as X and not Y, it must be X, it must be humanoid. 

The Kudzo of Ionising Radiation
However, we ourselves have changed our own environment, specifically, our energy environment as it is carried by the atmosphere. Compare 100 years ago to now, these experiences once rare at a certain point almost became commonplace in comparison.We are pumping an enormous amount of energy through the atmosphere, radically changing it's natural state. This is discounting one off experiments in energising the atmosphere. It reminds me of the ill fated attempts to introduce new species into the environment to control nature. Remember that one ?  All sorts of unforeseen effects took place.
Ask a Southerner about the introduction of Kudzu...

Synthetic Evolution, Uncertainty and Unanticipated Effects 
Again, you change one thing in a system, everything to a lesser or greater degree must be in abeyance these self organising subsystems to the whole. Take Persinger's God helmet as an example of this consideration. Atmospheric conditions effect the conductivity of the atmosphere as also does solar influences etc. Thats why I say it resembles weather and it moves like weather in waves. Our energetic environment has changed and I suspect this has had a transient effect on neurology for some who are prone whereas others are not. This to me is more disturbing, if true, than little clueless "green men."  Of course, this is qualified to say that this theory is subject to change.

More to Follow...

The Quantum Mirror

Perhaps the universe is imbued with the facility of intelligence that is incommensurable to human experience, however as of late, I suspect that the reciprocated relationship we find ourselves in just might be fallible on both sides of this contingent relationship.
The universe seeks it's nature through us and therefore, it's comparative analysis of what it may be through the exploration of observers may be evolving rather then being in a omniscient and proverbial cat bird seat that directs traffic as it were. Perhaps the more material of differentiated observations that occur within and without it, and, we an isthmus lodged within, a proverbial mirror as both participating and observing in this expanding domain, are more of a artistic nature, as is our host. Image and imagination and their linkage manifested through thought ( which has no existence in of itself) as a measuring device of referents that are only germain as self referential comparisons, apparently exist only through the contingencies of the observer's relationship with the observed,  in more than one state. The recombinant nature of imagination based on the context through which it builds upon,,could this be mirrored by our hosting organism, a living, not static universe? One thinks of the quantum observer effect in this relationship. .not to be anthropomorphic in a bias projection, but to consider, the observer effect as a reply, to put it simply, "message received"
This leads back to the "I" /Not I"entanglement that seems to indicate where we draw distinctions, as a creative act, may be as fluid elsewhere. If so, no two individuals may experience "heaven" alike where the twain meets, which appears to be confirmed in the nature of the narratives found in NDE.
Our experience, imagination, measurement, images, may be more fluid than we normally assume to be, more of a artistic nature, than concreted solids of perception, and so where is the measurement applied to us?  Again, there appears to be a fluidity in this based on reciprocal observations. If so, we are never alone in the classical sense. Who or what is a ghost and who or what is not seems to be a matter of location from whence an observation is made in such an open arrangement.
To use a poor metaphor, if this is an adaptive relationship with learning strategies on both sides of the mirror, where is this headed, in evolutionary terms? Do we become what we imagine ourselves to be? Going further along this line of transit, are EVP phenomenon simply what we imagine them as they should be? Same for the bizarre nature of extraterrestrials that have been reported? Are these contingent in nature according to how they are conceptualized by the linkage between image and imagination? A mirror within a mirror?