The Variations of Transitive Coherence
The answer from some was that they remained where they were at the moment of death bearing in mind sidereal time has been replaced by spacetime denoting dimensionality..and if dimensionality arises as a illusion of a misplaced metric as a transitive state, this potential begs more considerations of the information field of “consciousness” in relation to that of the environment and the binding agency of transference (if geometry is a misnomer) as all energy is information constitutes the singularity of a field…., does one fold into the other as an equation? Is a wall, for example, a metric of information and does the relationship of this metric connect to locality to that of a binding agent as a hard drive would or a plenum?
Corresponding to this connection of a proverbial form of pointillism, sometimes these ventures can organize themselves to be the written equivalent of a musical fugue as if they were composed by Phillip Glass, a sort of tapestry that resembles a tunnel I have woven that in hindsight might be as self referential as a favorite tee shirt.
Does our database contain correlates to our environment as to allow transference by entropy in regard to energy as information? Is the information field a singularity that has distinctions drawn as various metrics of coherence or relationship?
Another aspect of this informational energy in various states in relationship relates to “ghost information”...Can you see from without your thoughts? What would be their representation as images? Would they appear as images derived from imagination due to the fact they are reliant on your individual set of semiotics, identifiers and associations of thought to image.
All this reminds me of Ib Al Arabi’s hermeticism as a cosmology in that he observed that due to this effect, no two individuals “see heaven” in exactly the same way. Think of the same variability in UAP...is there a correlation?
This brings another aspect of these hypothetical ruminations..the accounts by some children that their return to a somatic state was assisted by individuated sentience which created in their images derived from the same sources as mentioned previously..the images that ranged from “God” to “Angels” as a superimposition of their identifiers. However appearances, derived from my own experiences cannot be trusted lest I fall into a waking dream. And so...if energy is information can it be an environment for other forms of life..specifically non biological and sentient lifeforms whose orientation is this field should it constitute the creation of the derivatives we ourselves inhabit? In other words, self organizing forms of energy evolved from this field as we have evolved in our own organic environment through the evolution of adaptation?
The danger in these ruminations strikes me as ironic as the more complex equations of possibilities are derived we seem to go into an area of proverbial folk tales, or the associations we carry in relation to our culture. Then we turn around to glance at modern folk tales based on technological imagery...UAP. Can information be manipulated in the singularity of an information field as to allow transference by borrowing the local terms derived from the aggregate sum of the human species as a database. Input this and one creates a conveyance of an equation based on “borrowing” another's metrics to transverse them.
Its a slippery slope full of intriguing connections and potential pratfalls when one theorised intangibles to create new associative patterns for consumption. Certainly, the universe is much stranger than we can imagine it to be.