Where do we find a criticism of silence on the part of our cultural institutions when it comes down to the organised nature of a roaring silence toward UAP?
On the radar screen, it is invisible, more so than at any time in recent history, while the focus has turned to the historical archives of long ago events as a proverbial safety zone.
Curiosity has been corralled into obscurities. One could say this is the inadvertent trivialization of the subject rendering it toothless.
The fervor of years past to have the subject taken seriously has descended into the depths of circular arguments and juvenile name calling over ancient and largely irrelevant events that are as ambiguous as the participants are emotionally chained to jousting over their competitive superiority on a subject that lacks any verifiable expertise.
What happened? How did a widely reported global anomaly become a fringe topic, marginalized despite an overwhelming acceptance that something is tampering with our basic perceptions of what is possible?
Perhaps it is worthwhile to undertake a forensic analysis of the state of the art as a non existent, which is a dangerous territory as a state confined to one's imaginative processes with the critical assumption in mind that analyzing data in a dream state is sufficient to explore what is actually taking place.
Looking at the historical record, interest in the subject has de-evolved into history repeating itself as witnessed by the predominance of tribal cults of worship proliferate now as they did two thousand years ago before the insertion of science interrupted the worship of what were essentially beliefs built upon the simple essence of suspicions.
Any answer is better than none or is it?
A recent essay by a scientists suggested we are too ignorant to be studied in any great involvement by extraterrestrials and the state of no state of investigation toward the provocations of UAP may be handing the knife of this conclusion by the hilt to any would be party who held that opinion.
We seemingly are so infused with cross purposes as to be rendered incapable of organizing ourselves out of a paper bag.
The inexorable evaporation of belief systems based on faith alone continues unabated while the opposite if true in regard to a 500 pound elephant in the room.
The UAP phenomenon has been abdicated by technological science largely because it is benign and the discovery science required to probe its manifestations is considered largely to have no practical purpose in the sense we could make use of it in the application of further tools of a more pragmatic nature.
At the same time nearly every discovery made by science at it’s beginnings had no practical purpose that could be utilised fully. What can we do with lightning directly? Yet it held the principle of electricity. The examples are endless.
My mother used to say that ignorance is bliss but one has to wonder if the other side of the coin is that this has a price tag attached to it.
This abdication has a passive-aggressive nature in the formulations of a social nature that could be termed as silence becomes or is transferable to denial without a day in court or for that matter, a half hearted debate.
For how many decades did science claim without investigation or the collecting of data that “rocks do not fall from the sky.” How can you deny such and such does not exist if you refuse to look at it?