It may be the case for what we term ghosts who are a metaphor rooted in experiential references that have a unique signature, a life among the living but if this is so, it must be apparent if there is any self awareness involved within a third state that has reconciled the exterior and interior parallel universes, that this self awareness, more of a distinction..must realise” it “is no longer human.
This singularity that is neither exteriorised or interiorised may go a long way as to why some conjecture that environments may contain human memories and yet that is paradoxical in the sense that when EVP equipment is used as a google search engine, correspondences can arise that are uncanny. To put it simply, the energy in the environment is entangled with the energy of information in this third state to produce effects that seemingly are situated in a non local environment that yet is rooted in the arrangements that produced them.
He conveyed a conversation he had with a Siberian shaman who thought that these atmospherically based intrusions were in effect the influence of the dead, more specifically, those who had been tortured and suffered extraordinary burdens which translates into another dimension or state that of all attributes that are human defies description the tonality of high emotional states. Another influence was the reportage of John Keel who suspected much the same although applying the term demonic to ufological reports as a placeholder word that lacks any substantive definition seemed a bridge too far. Demonic seems to describe an emotional realm of a heightened state rather than a specific creature unless we consider emotions to be independent of ourselves.
Is it A or B or AB=C? or as simple as ABC? Some of us are old enough to remember a certain purveyor of recording tape. In the shilling of their product they posed a question, “is it real or is it a recording?” The question was posed to infer that the recording had such a profound vividness that it was difficult to discern any difference between the two. However, we could say that whom that was recorded and the recording are both real which brings up the subject of Electronic Voice Phenomenon, a term that does nothing to specify much of anything.
Something strange began in the year 1692, in the immediate area of Salem Massachusetts that perhaps, as John Keel suggested, provides a mirror through history, that reflects our own equally strange times. It is also a narrative of reasonable doubt, perhaps one of a certain self doubt, that anchors us to maybe and perhaps rather than crossing a line between theory and that of irreversible edicts when it comes to a potential discernment.
Though rare comparatively "accident" as both a term that defines an event as random, or for that matter, having a single causation, may be an example of naivete at play.
Yet, as a phenomenon, a play has a truth that is a transcription of yet another layer of reality, that has both it's own truth that is diametrically opposed to other experiential observations in other contexts, yet exists only by the thread of relationship, but exist it does as an intermediary form of self organized communication. The relativity factor of the observer. Determinism may be a process of contingent relationships that do not obey any direct causality and are fluid in nature and perhaps they are observable in relationship by the phenomenon of unknown aerial anomalies.
The last global war, atomic bomb, the Holocaust,the cold war and threat of atomic catastrophe, the poisoning of the physical environment, etc. The parallel mutation of unknown aerial phenomenon that in turn, reflects a recombination of "markers" as suggested by Dr Vallee who also suspects "a physics of information" is at play. It may be only as cognitive or responsive as the observer is.
. In other words, if studied in depth it has no coherent organizational approach in relation to a task in sentient terms inasmuch as it approaches susceptible individuals rather than demonstrating a more global coherence, as any study will affirm it has no consistent form in of itself, it has no consistent "occupants" but what it does demonstrate over and over again is a butterfly effect arising from the predisposition of the observer that individuates the perception of how this phenomenon or event is organized. In being both non sentient in of itself as well as being a convergence of these "weather systems" rather than a predictive set of behaviorism, it is chaotic and individualized by perception alone, and so it is seldom outside of viral patterns that have a relatively short shelf life, that these visual memes appear to have a determined form. They come and go in strictly a cultural context that in of itself establishes a cellular rather than sentient portrayal of the observers context that has been conditioned in the observer in a universal societal pattern that gains particulars by the individuation of variations the observer brings to the table.
Contaminated in a viral manner by both the intelligence communities and the self referential bias that weighs the evidence by anticipation and intent, the phenomenon becomes more of a product than a subject of sober study. Add to this the entertainment factor and as one friend described this scenario to me, we could have survived shooting ourselves in the foot once but not thrice over as a matter of pretending we know what we are actually have not yet begun to understand in any meaningful or coherent manner.
This seems to me so emblematic of much of the paranormal, a projection of ourselves which has yet to be assigned an identity. The Hermit as a distinction of behavior is a signpost perhaps that leads us to introspection without providing a dogma, or a paint by the numbers outline. In this perhaps is the search that has continued and will continue beyond us, for the answers we ourselves have to create, as to what we may be a significant portion of.
We have known from our earliest history that what we observe has a profound influence on our mentations, our conceptual models of reality. In this are the threads of evolution in ways we do not completely understand inasmuch we do not understand the root of sentience itself. From the beginning, it seems we have invented certain doppelgangers, parallel narratives that assign a supernatural connection to ourselves, that, in turn, hide what actually is astonishing, that such a species such as ourselves has thrived on a remote and isolated planet, largely left to it's own devices.
Another enigma wrapped within the narrative stories is that none suffice to date. More questions than answers, which, I think as more time passes, has more to do with the strange nature of consciousness, that everyone flees from as if it were too dangerous, too uncertain to address. We would prefer to deal with phantoms, especially those that fill in the blanks as to the origin of sentience, as well as it's nature.
This relates to the entangled state of the observer, does it not? The Shape-shifter can navigate through different levels of consciousness, dream and waking states and the astral plane. Somewhat related to the Trickster, it is more flexible and less tied to a specific goal. The shadow aspect emphasizes instability, fickleness, and lack of conviction, as can be seen ( warning, socio-political content) in any number of modern day politicians who reinvent themselves to appeal to the latest popular trends. What specifically caught my attention was the two accounts of robed figures investigated by Ted, with "wolf like faces" that stole a basketball from kids, floated over a fence, and did not respond to shotgun fire, as well as several robed creatures that passed five feet away from another rancher, smoking cigarettes, completely ignoring him while speaking in an indistinguishable tongue.
What cued further interest was an account from Collins Lakes, New Jersey, completely separated from these odd events, of a robed creature "shuffling" around the side of a garage. Another family member saw this creature whom he speculated was trying to eat from the trash. Odd, a uniform disguise, one that makes impossibly indistinguishable features out of the corporeal frames underneath them that hold upright these unidentified "hooligans" yet, no attempt is made to hide their faces, which, while the descriptions make them rather odd looking humanoids, they are different enough to attract attention. Duly noted also is the three accounts of similar robes, a "uniformity" that is striking. Archetypes that follow our anticipations, that have a lack of direction. Perhaps, not surprisingly.
There is so much signal noise between the mythologists and the nuts and bolts crowd, that the strange nature of this phenomenon is buried beneath tons of certainty, when nothing could be further from the truth. It is demonstrative of the nature of uncertainty as made concrete by phantoms given roles somewhere in the murky depths of the connections between the mind and matter. Could it be that our individual certainties are in direct proportion to the uncertainties we avoid? The UFO phenomenon is emblematic of overlaying what we know to a incommensurable manifestation, and in this it may be we are receding deeper into the shadows of our own preliminary conclusions, without knowing the context of our own relationship with simply the prosaic, let alone the unknown. This contradiction, at times, seems to be in bold print between the lines of anything that attempts to apply an agenda to this phenomenon.
Again can we separate what we think from what we see? Are we part of the genome of the UFO phenomenon? I think so, which makes this much more daunting an investigation that finding a grail whether it be a piece of strange metal or exopolitics, which seem quaintly provincial when compared to unraveling the origin of these mimics of sentience, strangely attached to our own. The UFO phenomenon seems to indicate the necessity for understanding that like the hermit, the cloaked figure, we need to avoid associated our identification of this portent away not toward consensus reality.
Finally, we have this to consider in terms of the UFO and it's cast of occupants as it relates to the creation of perhaps a new archetype more fitting to the creation of what has been termed "quantum logic" in an earlier post. Rather than a hermetic pursuit perhaps we are experiencing a parallel archetype of an emerging reality, that has been under the scrim of development for centuries. that works from the inside out by the individual rather than the monarchistic model of set dogmas and strictures. A form of new logic.
In this the challenge it seems is to not fall back onto old certainties, trying to fit a round peg into a square hole. The question is again, can we face uncertainty, and say openly, we don't know, we have clues. we have challenges, we have no map whatsoever. I remember a dialog I had with a well known pundit, who told me if we approached this challenge without the baggage from the past, we would have nothing to discuss or talk about. I think nothing could be further from the elusive truth of the matter.
In a sense we use division instead of multiplication when we analyze the compounded effects of embedded multiple forces within and without us that we navigate by being an isthmus or lens of them by their passage as a portion of what ourselves are composed of. In this sense we have an implicate ordering of effects that we define as being separated by the caricaturisation of constituent components that have no relationship subtle or otherwise to us, as if we ourselves had this all backwards, that we ourselves were the drivers rather than ourselves being a emergent process of effects, that we are effects in of ourselves of our environment, and there are few choices involved in our physiology or psychology that we can wrest from it's origins in nature as a living emergent system.
Our environment is chock full of anomalies that are, to say the last far from being visible.All of this is available through the mapping accomplished by the U.S Geological Survey.
Only in this case we have the network of millions of fractal minds all connected in a network wherein all are individuated stations or processors in the physics of information that are invariably linked by physiological and cybernetic patterns in their similarity may have a capability to influence probability by the convergence of a linkage from fluid and seeming random atmospheric effects, that co-join with a proverbial pressure system of temporary coherence that arises in the field of potential observers in an analogous "perfect storm, rare comparatively, but just as cogent and just as fluid that like the atmosphere itself can exhibit various states of solidity, even invisibility but none the less, all express the medium that produces the message of effects we can observe whether it is water or ice, or a gas as observable spectrum's of their materiality.
Is there a relationship between the range of altitude wherein these semi-solid anomalous forms are created and the nature of the atmospheric energy found there in a correspondence to a subtle wavelength found in the physiology of the energy produced in the physical brain as organized by the extra dimensional qualities of the mind? All of this seems to indicate favorable conditions between mediums to find an expression of coherence in both that are exceptions rather than normalized states of either one. It reminds me of a tumble lock wherein all the cylinders must align in correspondence to move the latching mechanism to an open position, or at least that's what my intuition appears to be expressing to me.
Biophotonics is the study, research and applications of photons in their interactions within and on biological systems. Topics of research pertain more generally to basic questions of biophysics and related subjects - for example, the regulation of biological functions, cell growth and differentiation, connections to so-called delayed luminescence, and spectral emissions in supermolecular processes in living tissues, etc. There are many such relationships to the influence of relationships between external and internal photonic states yet to be identified but a speculative correlation does seem to be likely in the near future. The image below are biophotons present in water.
n the brain we have energetic pre-synaptic nodes where information jumps such a gap all within the neural net. These gaps have been found to have the state wherein two states ( such as an example of yes versus no) can exist simultaneously. Can an external influence carried into the brain as information superimpose itself into these gaps wherein the neural net acts as a receiver that translates this information by way of the memory to create quasi material images? Ones that exist in one characteristic of the field and not in the other. In the cases where we have physical evidence in terms of information being superimposed materially no one has bothered to characterize these as PSI effects, which to this writer are obvious as a characterization of interrelated phenomenon. Another way to put this, is that they do not occur when an observer is absent.
This then is also reflected in the study of exchanges of a similar nature found in living species.As Above, so below. If we see these exchanges as being representative of a process involving a living universe, in terms of form, then the core of our planet as a base metal corresponds to the legominism of Alchemy.
On the topic of magnesium in Eureka Springs, Arkanasas, the historic 1886 Crescent Hotel and Spa is often noted for the wide range of paranormal phenomenon, among them the observation of "ghost" images that appear to represent quite a wide range of characters that often, observers equate with those who are deeply associated with the history of this edifice.Interestingly, this structure's load bearing walls are the work of masons , who began this project in 1884, utilizing extremely heavy magnesium limestone. Another structure made from this material that has the same effect of producing phantom phenomenon is the Hotel Monteleone in New Orleans. Geologically, in the United States, when one looks for deposits of this material, it is interesting to note certain correlations. Of course, in the U.K we have more famous examples of this material and variations thereof, associated with what is loosely termed "paranormal experiences."
Some truths can be told better in a fiction from shadow puppetry, when we must discern our own authoring of such presumptions. Humility seemingly has no chair on which to sit in the hierarchies of the clamor within the use of language alone to claim any possession in a shell game without a pea.