The Zero In Light of Embryos and Transubstantiation

 "Common experience is the gold reserve which confers an exchange value on the currency which words are; without this reserve of shared experiences, all our pronouncements are checks drawn on insufficient funds."
-Rene Daumal

Are you and I embryonic from another platform of perspective? We identify and translate by language in the triangulation of semiotics. In these relationships of experiential hexities, is there yet another relationship  that remains yet deeply buried to us? A relationship  that remains incommensurable to us? Are we in the process of using experiential transubstantiation as a bootstrapping exercise comparable to that of a fetal cord in a womb?
If our sustenance is a means, and not an end onto itself that unfolds as it is enfolded in a germination of yet another modality of sentience as a expansion of complexity it may be that our natural state being bewilderment is no surprise in this context. And yet we are encircled by pronouncements that seemingly do not recognize their own contingent nature.as a background to free will, like the amber that preserves a dead insect.
Everything in every state has to  considered in the light of the fact that even nothing is a something and this relationship is perpetually unfolding. There is no zero. Zero is an artifact that is a placeholder for an enigma that has no place in pronouncements and yet transactional relationships are formatted as a zero sum that is unaware we exist in a state of embryonic transubstantiation.This is indeed a species with high strangeness and we may represent a mutation from within this amber of neolithic culture that presents itself as trained monkeys riding bicycles.
Perhaps altruistic subversion of art  is called forth in response to this surrealism that is a philosophic underpinning of dialectic materialism no matter how infinitely miniscule its influence may be,
Do you think so?