Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Ghost Communication and The Classification of Their Origins

One of the many perspectives I have entertained is the apparent effects of presumed ghost sentience in terms of interaction with the living. As part of this investigative thread, I have educated myself in the nature of what is termed cellular intelligence. Below is an example of one of the many theoretical examinations of this phenomenon, and so consequently, I have taken quite a radical view of ghost "sentience."
I have always been fascinated by the genetics of memory in relation to chaos and coherence theories, that is also embedded in quantum theory as information as a form of physics of the relationships between the states of stored transformative, and transmitted  organized energy.
Herein arose a distinct possibility in relation to the presumption of occupied sentience in relation to ghost communication. Think of this as quantum semiotics in relation to a databank.
 In other words, such communication, with ghosts, while interactive,may not necessarily constitute someone speaking on the other end of the line but rather a quantized databank that is accessed through a triad of combinatorial locks held by the state of the observer having access, the location and the state of the localized ambient energy that opens a proverbial tumbler lock of referenced stored associations, identifications, and corresponding responses that  are matrixed as both individuated banks yet cannot exist without a series of relationships beyond this localized core that also exist beyond our current measurements of space time, which is actually, simply space. One could say this is a further extension of the conservation of energy as it relates to organization of it into a physics of information. In other words once information is created, it cannot be erased. It can only change states in a genome that encompasses it's further differentiation.
We know by physics that material is in a state that is not completely material and that what we can sense through animal perception does not include "the data behind the data", so to speak.
And of course time is created by the semiotics of  comparison in relationship with localized conditions. Consequently, there always seemed to be a error in the presumption of the "dead" in regard to their state being exactly in line with that of the living as they are dead, yet we presume that a shared interface that embodies the same characteristics as if they were alive when they are two distinct states that only have in common, the presumption of a common state because we can draw responses that correspond to our definition of intelligence but "intelligence" itself has not one but many modalities dependent on the observer. Whether it is a voice response system, a voice transcription software, a cellphone, or a television, our forebears would undoubtedly and understandably identify their behavior as being sentient or intelligent in of themselves, and from a more advanced perspective we can say they are and yet are not in various degrees.
If we have two observers, one "dead" and one "living" could the "dead" observer mimic by behaviorism that he or she were still alive while not being present in any sense by the means of a quantized cellular intelligence?
Hmmm...in a sardonic twist could we call this a communication with the living death of a unique state of stored information.
In many discussions with a psychologist friend, we have termed non local communication with the local as uploading and down loading that occur not as separated but as two states of the same phenomenon that can also appear to be observed in metaphysical texts. In other words think of ( for example) the Tibetan and Egyptian Books of The Dead.
There seems to be a downloading as well as uploading of memory occurring by a change of state through the exchange of mediums that are incompatible in relation to one another. It does not appear to be the erasure of the observers individuated data bank by externalization of the stored information but rather both uploading it while downloading a new state that is in relation to a delimited potential that must be "recycled" from it's fixity of individuation. "What was is "what is in this sense of space but in a entirely different set of relationships where "memory" is separated from sentience. Could this be so? Are there other qualifiers? I think so.
The conservation of energy requires a previous state that one could perhaps liken to memory as a genome or butterfly effect, a return to it's original state while the effect of a previous state remains. It is a difficult proposition to place into an understandable language, or at least how I suspect, being dead is not a simple affair. Neither is "communication" with the "dead"

 Depending on the set and setting, and the other variables I mentioned, the information received by the senses or by instrumentation can range from the absurd to extremely pertinent by the experimenter \observer. I have been struck by what is classified as a human ghost and what I suspect are the ghosts that are claimed to be that of a extraterrestrial visitation. Once again this is an example of how language seemingly becomes a self referential definition that steers the theories that arise from faux terms that have no reality other than being referents.
 I covered this issue in "The Stupidity of The Paranormal."
Even more so than human ghosts, the quality of what the inadvertent observer experiences from these human ghosts, these "extraterrestrial ghosts" interact in extremely vague, contradictory terms and since the anticipation in relation to the set and setting outside of the parameters of a known "haunted" location, the perception experienced follows the high ambivalence of the setting, which has no associative or identifying semiotic that would say "this is a ghost" or "this location is "haunted" and ,of course, alleged human ghosts in terms of the spectrum of their materialization run the range from shadows to full bodied apparitions. Often, in many cases ghosts are envisioned in dreams where they provide messages while seemingly occupying a domicile externally.
In the case of both human and extraterrestrial ghosts are often associated with very localized "orbs" or spheres that make sharp transitions of trajectory, often at near right angles, variants of velocity from incredibly impossible rapidity to slow moving transits.
Psychokinetic activity of human ghosts can  leave imprints, traces of footsteps, manipulate objects, float above the ground in defiance of gravity, vanish into walls, transform their appearance, much like the apparitional aspects of " extraterrestrials." One recalls the inexplicable indentations of  the ground labelled as "trace evidence" in regard to "extraterrestrial landings" which I personally suspect are psychokinetic in nature. What appears to be the sole arbiter of classifying a human apparition from an extraterrestrial apparition is appearance that seemingly is steered once again in the manner of anticipatory semiotic associations and identifications of the observer that interact with the environment. Some experiences of interaction with the ghosts that appear to be extraterrestrial also includes dead relations, such as a grandfather, etc. I suspect none of this is coincidental and it's only our language that steers the false demarcations we have made in classification of liminal realities as well as to their externalized manifestations, which acts as a binding agent that is highly individualized, hence highly individualized alien "ghosts" appear in a taxonomy that defies the parameters of three dimensional creatures. This in relation to the high ambivalence of the setting wherein such events occur.
As I related in explaining my abandonment of "Intangible Materiality" I have left the constrictions that others examine the paranormal with, hence I have no community or common ground with popular culture or the architecture of silly argumentative dialogs that are not dialogs whatsoever.
In the next few posts, I hope to flesh out these thoughts more fully.

No comments:

Post a Comment