tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-927396480055054170.post7748416047003583091..comments2023-06-08T06:53:33.892-04:00Comments on A TRANSIT OF CONTINGENCIES: It's About TimeBruce Duensinghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06770861553045757360noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-927396480055054170.post-11857161967772833132014-07-01T09:41:40.225-04:002014-07-01T09:41:40.225-04:00E Harris
It seems that space time and it's inc...E Harris<br />It seems that space time and it's incomprehensible nature drives anything and everything that is considered anomalous, and yet it is by far the most difficult subject to wrangle into words, and all we seem to play with are open ended questions and yet all of them are worth pursuing. Our relationship with space time is as entangled as any theory we can muster in relation to any causation it allows, from the accepted to the strange.<br />Bruce<br />Bruce Duensinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06770861553045757360noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-927396480055054170.post-86233832668292791222014-06-30T21:21:09.626-04:002014-06-30T21:21:09.626-04:00When I want answers I go to Google; when I want qu...When I want answers I go to Google; when I want questions, I read your essays. Your older essays went beyond questions into crashing my mental parser within a sentence or two, like koans injected intravenously. Trying to pull at one strand of the knots isn't going to unravel the spell.<br /><br />I have just started posting some of my old essays on my new blog, <a href="http://mindsbasis.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">Mindspace & Minds' Basis</a> (mindsbasis.blogspot.com). It explores the possible relations between minds and spirits and physical information. <br /><br />Some of the bits in your essay to which I wanted to respond:<br /><br /><b>The last time I checked there the count was up to eleven dimensions. </b><br />I just wrote a bit on the math of dimensions, Geometric Algebra, but I'm not too happy with it - hard, yet vague.<br /><br /> <b>Asking what time it is becomes a silly exercise in subjectivity and what we call eternity is a tricky business.</b><br />The nature of eternity is one of the main topics in the first few posts on the Minds' Basis blog. <br /><br /> <b>If quantum mechanics provides for the reorganization of energetic information imbued with physicality in a manner that allows time travel, a question arises. Is there more than one version of the past? If so, how many versions are possible on parallel paths or more cogently, parallel universes of human experience? Is there a universe where the butterfly effect runs in reverse, achieving what some scientists label as retro-causation?</b><br />Have you looked at the <a href="http://realityshifters.com/pages/yourstories.html" rel="nofollow">stories</a> on Cynthia Sue Larson's Reality Shifters site and the Reddit <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/Glitch_in_the_Matrix/top/?sort=top&t=all" rel="nofollow">"Glitch in the Matrix"</a> ? Glimpses and sometimes permanent relocations to alternate pasts and presents are a staple, along with less easily categorizable reports.<br /><br /> <b>We all know the old axiom from physics, that no information \ energy is destroyed, it is simply modified.</b><br />This is what I posit as the basis for eternity. The modifications are thermalized progressive entanglement with the rest of the universe which both distributes and compresses the patterning. This also gives a mechanism for morphic resonance and remote viewing, among other things.<br /><br /> <b>Are some cases of precognition evidence of retro-causation?</b><br />"Glitch in the Matrix" also has cases that lead to thoughts along this line.E. Harrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00403451420766076432noreply@blogger.com